ArangoDB v3.13 is under development and not released yet. This documentation is not final and potentially incomplete.
SatelliteCollections
Collections synchronously replicated to all servers, available in the Enterprise Edition
ArangoDB Enterprise Edition ArangoGraph
When doing joins in an ArangoDB cluster data has to be exchanged between different servers.
Joins are executed on a Coordinator. It prepares an execution plan and executes it. When executing, the Coordinator contacts all shards of the starting point of the join and ask for their data. The DB-Servers carrying out this operation loads all its local data and then ask the cluster for the other part of the join. Again, this is distributed to all involved shards of this join part.
In sum this results in much network traffic and slow results depending of the amount of data that has to be sent throughout the cluster.
SatelliteCollections are collections that are intended to address this issue. They facilitate the synchronous replication and replicate all their data to all DB-Servers that are part of the cluster.
This enables the DB-Servers to execute that part of any join locally.
This greatly improves performance for such joins at the costs of increased storage requirements and poorer write performance on this data.
To create a SatelliteCollection set the replicationFactor
of this collection
to “satellite”.
Using arangosh:
db._create("satellite", {"replicationFactor": "satellite"});
A full example
arangosh> var explain = require("@arangodb/aql/explainer").explain
arangosh> db._create("satellite", {"replicationFactor": "satellite"})
arangosh> db._create("nonsatellite", {numberOfShards: 8})
arangosh> db._create("nonsatellite2", {numberOfShards: 8})
Let’s analyze a normal join not involving SatelliteCollections:
arangosh> explain("FOR doc in nonsatellite FOR doc2 in nonsatellite2 RETURN 1")
Query string:
FOR doc in nonsatellite FOR doc2 in nonsatellite2 RETURN 1
Execution plan:
Id NodeType Site Est. Comment
1 SingletonNode DBS 1 * ROOT
4 CalculationNode DBS 1 - LET #2 = 1 /* json expression */ /* const assignment */
2 EnumerateCollectionNode DBS 0 - FOR doc IN nonsatellite /* full collection scan */
12 RemoteNode COOR 0 - REMOTE
13 GatherNode COOR 0 - GATHER
6 ScatterNode COOR 0 - SCATTER
7 RemoteNode DBS 0 - REMOTE
3 EnumerateCollectionNode DBS 0 - FOR doc2 IN nonsatellite2 /* full collection scan */
8 RemoteNode COOR 0 - REMOTE
9 GatherNode COOR 0 - GATHER
5 ReturnNode COOR 0 - RETURN #2
Indexes used:
none
Optimization rules applied:
Id RuleName
1 move-calculations-up
2 scatter-in-cluster
3 remove-unnecessary-remote-scatter
All shards involved querying the nonsatellite
collection fan out via the
Coordinator to the shards of nonsatellite
. In sum, 8 shards open 8 connections
to the Coordinator, asking for the results of the nonsatellite2
join. The Coordinator
fans out to the 8 shards of nonsatellite2
. So there us quite some
network traffic.
Let’s now have a look at the same using SatelliteCollections:
arangosh> db._query("FOR doc in nonsatellite FOR doc2 in satellite RETURN 1")
Query string:
FOR doc in nonsatellite FOR doc2 in satellite RETURN 1
Execution plan:
Id NodeType Site Est. Comment
1 SingletonNode DBS 1 * ROOT
4 CalculationNode DBS 1 - LET #2 = 1 /* json expression */ /* const assignment */
2 EnumerateCollectionNode DBS 0 - FOR doc IN nonsatellite /* full collection scan */
3 EnumerateCollectionNode DBS 0 - FOR doc2 IN satellite /* full collection scan, satellite */
8 RemoteNode COOR 0 - REMOTE
9 GatherNode COOR 0 - GATHER
5 ReturnNode COOR 0 - RETURN #2
Indexes used:
none
Optimization rules applied:
Id RuleName
1 move-calculations-up
2 scatter-in-cluster
3 remove-unnecessary-remote-scatter
4 remove-satellite-joins
In this scenario all shards of nonsatellite
are contacted. However,
as the join is a satellite join all shards can do the join locally
as the data is replicated to all servers reducing the network overhead
dramatically.
Caveats
The cluster automatically keeps all SatelliteCollections on all servers in sync by facilitating the synchronous replication. This means that writes are executed on the leader only, and this server coordinates replication to the followers. If a follower doesn’t answer in time (due to network problems, temporary shutdown, etc.) it may be removed as a follower. This is being reported to the Agency.
The follower (once back in business) then periodically checks the Agency and knows
that it is out of sync. It then automatically catches up. This may take a while
depending on how much data has to be synced. When doing a join involving the satellite
you can specify how long the DB-Server is allowed to wait for sync until the query
is being aborted. See Cursors for details.
During network failure there is also a minimal chance that a query was properly distributed to the DB-Servers but that a previous satellite write could not be replicated to a follower and the leader dropped the follower. The follower however only checks every few seconds if it is really in sync so it might indeed deliver stale results.